The Atlantic has a longform article
detailing the current US nursing shortage in which it highlights that 1.2
million nursing positions will be unfilled in the next five years. While nursing shortages have existed in the
US for most of the last forty years, this one is going to be different. The US nurse supply has been artificially
inflated since the start of the recession.
Now that the recession has abated, nurse retirement numbers are spiking. Musillo Unkenholt saw more demand for
foreign-trained nurses in 2015 than we had in the whole of 2009-14.
The reasons for the
current US nursing shortage are many:
Baby Boom
Generation Demand. The US Baby Boom
generation, those born 1946-1964, has reached an age where they will
increasingly demand nursing services. As
The Atlantic points out:
Today, there are more Americans over the age of 65 than at any other time in U.S. history. Between 2010 and 2030, the population of senior citizens will
increase by 75 percent to 69 million,
meaning one in five Americans will be a senior citizen; in 2050, an estimated 88.5 million people in the U.S. will be aged 65 and older.
Aging Nursing
Workforce. Out of the 3 million US
nurses, one million are over age 50 and will be expected to retire in the next
10-15 years.
Few Nurse
Educators. Nursing Ph.D. programs have
been unable to attract nursing faculty.
These nurses Ph.D’s have traditionally made up large numbers of nursing
school faculty. Part of the reason for
this is that a Bachelor nursing graduate is usually offered a job at
graduation, thus reducing that graduate’s incentive to seek out graduate
nursing education. Without a dramatic
increase in nurse faculty, it will be impossible for the US to supply enough
nurses to meet the demand.
Distribution
Challenges. Some of the American nursing
problem stems from the lack of mobility ion the nursing force. Nurses are often unwilling to leave their
hometowns for jobs in rural areas or high-nurse demand areas, even if those
positions pay better.
Lack of
Foreign-Nurses. Because of a terribly
though-out US immigration policy, it takes a nurse from the Philippines many
years to legally obtain a visa, in spite of the nursing shortage. The Philippines has traditionally been the
greatest supplier of US nurses. The
story is even worse for India, which would certainly be able to supply the US
with many nurses if it did not take 10 years for a fully-qualified nurse to
obtain a US visa. As a result of the
lack of US nursing visa options,
foreign-trained nurses have declined sitting for the US licensing exams.
Ten years ago the
US congress passed a special EX visa
just for occupations
that were found to be nationally short by the Department of Labor. These occupations were placed on the DOL’s
Schedule A. By placing an occupation on
Schedule A, the Department of Labor finds that the importation of workers in
the occupational classification will not negatively impact existing US labor.
Only two occupations are on Schedule A – Registered Nursing and Physical Therapy. Does it not stand to reason that there ought to be a better immigration program to allow these badly needed workers entry into the US?
Only two occupations are on Schedule A – Registered Nursing and Physical Therapy. Does it not stand to reason that there ought to be a better immigration program to allow these badly needed workers entry into the US?